MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2284447016 · doi:10.3928/0148-4834-20031101-06

From the Tower Into the Trenches: A Nurse Educator's Reflections on the Knowledge of Experience

2003· article· en· W2284447016 on OpenAlexaffabout
Paula Didham

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nursing Education · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicNursing education and management
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)NursingPosition (finance)TowerNurse educatorNurse educationAcute careMedicinePsychologyMedical educationHealth carePolitical scienceHistoryBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I have been in the tower for a long time. I have been teaching nursing for more than 20 years, and only now, after spending 6 months in the trenches as a staff nurse, have I begun to realize how far removed I had become from the real world of nursing. In this article, I will first discuss the experiences that motivated me to take a leave of absence from my teaching position in Canada for a staff nurse position in an acute care hospital in Florida. Then I will share my early reflections about what I learned as a staff nurse in Florida and how I interpreted this experience in the context of my own teaching practice and in the context of nursing education.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.209
Threshold uncertainty score0.390

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.361 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Nursing EducationSame topicNursing education and managementFrench-language works237,207