MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2284730941 · doi:10.1080/01932691.2015.1066259

DPD Molecular Simulations of Asphaltene Adsorption on Hydrophilic Substrates: Effects of Polar Groups and Solubility

2015· article· en· W2284730941 on OpenAlexfundno aff
R. Skartlien, Sébastien Simon, Johan Sjöblom

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dispersion Science and Technology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersPetrobrasAkzoNobelTotalCanadian Natural Resources Limited
KeywordsAsphalteneAdsorptionSolubilityPolarChemical engineeringChemistryMolecular dynamicsOrganic chemistryThermodynamicsChromatographyMaterials scienceComputational chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Adsorption of asphaltenes onto a polar substrate (e.g., a mineral) was modeled with dissipative particle dynamics (DPD) simulations, using continental asphaltene models. The adsorption mechanisms in 10–20% wt, of asphaltene in toluene/ heptane solutions were studied (well above the solubility limit). The structure in the adsorbed layer was highly sensitive to the presence of polar groups in the alkyl side chains and heteroatom content in the aromatic ring structure. Four types of asphaltene models were used: completely apolar (zero adsorption), apolar chains and polar heteroatoms, polar chains and no heteroatoms, and polar chains and heteroatoms (maximum adsorption). One hundred asphaltene monomers were distributed homogeneously in the solvent initially, in a ∼(10 nm)3 domain.Asphaltene monomers adsorbed irreversibly on the substrate via the polar group in the side chains, resulting in an average perpendicular orientation of the aromatic rings relative to the substrate. More frequent π–π stacking of the aromatic rings occurred for less solubility (more heptane), as in aggregates. With apolar side chains, only the heteroatoms in the aromatic ring structure had affinity to the substrate, but the ring plane did not have any preferred direction.An important finding is that the aromatic ring assemblies “shielded” the substrate and polar groups that were anchored to the substrate, resulting in an effective non-polar surface layer seen by asphaltenes in the bulk, leading to much lower adsorption probability of the remaining asphaltenes. This “adsorption termination” effect leads to mono-layer formation. Continued adsorption with multilayering and reversible nanoaggregate adsorption occurred when both side chains in the model asphaltene (located on opposite sides of the aromatic sheet) contained polar groups, with a higher probability of exposing further polar groups to the bulk asphaltene. The general conclusion is that the number and position of the polar groups in side chains determine to a large degree the adsorption and aggregation behavior/efficiency of (continental) asphaltenes, in line with experimental evidence. The heteroatoms in the aromatic ring structure plays a more passive role in this context, only by providing organization via more π–π stacking in the adsorbed layer, and in aggregates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Dispersion Science and TechnologySame topicPetroleum Processing and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207