MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2284745993 · doi:10.29173/af27279

De Bécassine à Yoko Tsuno : entre stéréotypes, oublis et renaissance. Réflexions sur les personnages féminins et leurs auteur(e)s en bande dessinée

2016· article· fr· W2284745993 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Chris Reyns-Chikuma

Bibliographic record

VenueALTERNATIVE FRANCOPHONE · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicComics and Graphic Narratives
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtThe RenaissanceAuteur theoryArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On l’a suffisamment répété sans que cela ne change vraiment la situation, au moins jusqu’à tout récemment : il y a peu de femmes dans la BD francophone, tant dans le rang des créatrices que dans celui des héroïnes. En sondant l’histoire de la BD, cet article entend discuter de plusieurs points cruciaux de la représentation des personnages féminins et de leurs auteur(e)s : différences de traitement, réception, stéréotypes, ambiguïtés et portée des choix graphiques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.116

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.012
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueALTERNATIVE FRANCOPHONESame topicComics and Graphic NarrativesFrench-language works237,207