MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2284790583 · doi:10.2118/177286-ms

A Simulation Model for Accurate Prediction of Uneven Proppant Distribution in the Marcellus Shale Coupled with Reservoir Geomechanics

2015· article· en· W2284790583 on OpenAlex
Sheng Yang, Zhangxin Chen, Yizheng Wei, Keliu Wu, Lei Shao, Wei Wu

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Eastern Regional Meeting · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGeomechanicsHydraulic fracturingPetroleum engineeringGeologyPermeability (electromagnetism)Oil shaleReservoir simulationGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Proppant distribution directly affects the effectiveness of hydraulic fracturing treatment, and significantly impact well production. In most situations, proppants are not uniformly distributed in hydraulic fractures and most proppants cannot be effectively transported into the far ends of fractures from wellbore. As a result of uneven proppant distribution and the ductile and soft geomechanical properties of the Marcellus shale, the reduction in hydraulic fracture conductivity varies greatly from cluster to cluster in a shale reservoir during reservoir pressure depletion. However, the influences of accurate prediction of uneven proppant distribution in hydraulic fractures and geomechanics on well productivity have been ignored in previous simulation studies. In this study, a reservoir simulation model for accurate prediction of uneven proppant distribution is developed. This dual-permeability model is coupled with reservoir geomechanics to illustrate the interaction of stress changing and multiphase flow within hydraulic fractures. History matching from a production well in the Marcellus shale is performed to validate our model. In addition, simulations using different matrix permeability are performed to demonstrate the impact of matrix permeability, along with the effect of proppant distributions and geomechanical properties on well performance. The simulation results show that gas production varies significantly due to different proppant distribution and geomechanical properties. Coupled geomechanical simulation results clearly indicate that the proppant embedding effects are also noticeable due to soft rock mechanical properties and uneven proppant distribution. This paper provides operators with a clear insight of influences of uneven proppant distribution and geomechanics on shale gas performance, optimization of a well treatment design, and an extensive view about the long-term production behavior for the Marcellus shale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.504
Threshold uncertainty score0.333

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it