Implementation of Evolving Fuzzy Models of a Nonlinear Process
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents details on the implementation of evolving Takagi-Sugeno-Kang (TSK) fuzzy models of a nonlinear process represented by the pendulum dynamics in the framework of the representative pendulum-crane systems. The pendulum angle is the output variable of the TSK fuzzy models that are obtained by online identification. The rule bases and the parameters of the TSK fuzzy models are continuously evolved by an online identification algorithm (OIA) that adds new rules with more summarization power and modifies the existing rules and parameters. The OIA is associated with an input selection algorithm that guides the modelling in terms of ranking the inputs according to their importance factors. Three TSK fuzzy models evolved by the OIA are exemplified. The performance of the new evolving TSK fuzzy models is illustrated by experimental results conducted on pendulum-crane laboratory equipment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it