MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2284859742 · doi:10.4271/2008-01-2600

Track-test Evaluation of Aerodynamic Drag Reducing Measures for Class 8 Tractor-Trailers

2008· article· en· W2284859742 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
Canadian institutionsFPInnovations
FundersMinistère des TransportsTransport Canada
KeywordsTractorAerodynamicsDragAerodynamic dragTrack (disk drive)Test (biology)Computer scienceAutomotive engineeringClass (philosophy)AeronauticsAerospace engineeringEngineeringArtificial intelligenceGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<div class="htmlview paragraph">Air resistance, after gross vehicle weight, is the largest factor responsible for vehicle energy loss and has an important influence on fuel consumption. The magnitude of aerodynamic drag is affected by the vehicle's shape, frontal area, and travel speed.</div> <div class="htmlview paragraph">This study aimed to evaluate several aerodynamic drag reduction measures applicable to class 8 tractor-trailer combinations. The tested aerodynamic devices included trailer aft body rear deflectors (boat tails), trailer skirts, gap deflectors, fuel tank fairings and truck rear-axle fenders. It also assessed the aerodynamic influence of opened doors on an empty wood chip van trailer on the fuel consumption of the tractor-trailer combination.</div> <div class="htmlview paragraph">The tests were conducted according to SAE J1321 Joint TMC/SAE Fuel Consumption Test Procedure - Type II. Testing took place on a closed test track at a fixed speed of 100 km/h, in order to eliminate the inconveniences of on-highway tests, such as the influences of traffic and the variation in driver response. The high-speed test track was a high-banked parabolic oval with a length of 6.4 km. The tests indicated that the influence on fuel consumption was less than 2% for fuel tank fairings, truck rear-axle fender, tractor-trailer gap deflector, and the opened doors on the empty chip van trailer. The test results showed up to 5% improvement in fuel consumption for the test vehicles equipped with boat tail devices, and up to 7% for the vehicles equipped with trailer skirts. For some of the tested devices, full-scale wind tunnel test results were available and comparisons were made between these results and track test results.</div> <div class="htmlview paragraph">Conservative estimations for Canadian transportation conditions show that some aerodynamic devices could bring annual greenhouse gas emissions reductions of four tonnes per vehicle. Combinations of different devices, such as trailer skirts and boat tails, would certainly increase the benefits. With payback periods ranging from 1.4 to 2.7 years, the majority of the tested aerodynamic devices represent viable measures to increase fuel efficiency and to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.</div>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.993
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it