MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

A homing endonuclease‐rps3 gene fusion in Ophiostoma novo‐ulmi (Dutch Elm disease fungus)

2008· article· en· W2285035443 on OpenAlexaff
Jyothi Sethuraman, Nancy C. Friedrich, David R. Edgell, Georg Hausner

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicForest Insect Ecology and Management
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHoming endonucleaseEndonucleaseBiologyGeneGeneticsRestriction enzymeMolecular biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In O. novo‐ulmi a homing endonuclease gene (HEG) is sometimes located within the mitochondrial (mt) rnl gene, rps3. Homing endonucleases (HE) are DNA cutting enzymes that cleave at asymmetric recognition sites (12‐40bp) and HEGs are mobile elements that can be free standing or encoded within group I or group II introns. Here we characterize the LAGLIDADG type homing endonuclease: I‐Onu 1, that exists as part of a fusion protein, as the HEG inserted in‐frame into the C‐terminus of the mt‐rps3 gene. Within the filamentous ascomycetes fungi rps3 is encoded by a group I intron located within the mt‐rnl gene. Sequencing analysis of rps3 HEG (−) and HEG (+) strains suggests the presence of 4bp direct repeats (GAAT) flanking the HEG insertion sites. This is unexpected as exonucleolytic activity associated with HEG mobility is thought to remove any overhangs generated by the HE. In vitro endonuclease assays using plasmid DNA that contains the rps3 HEG (−) allele (pRPS3) confirmed HE activity. The cleavage sites were mapped using P 32 5′end‐labeled 201bp PCR fragment (with predicted HE target site) derived from rps3. The results showed that the HE cuts at GAAT generating a 3′ GAAT overhang confirming the sequence data analysis. Overall this endonuclease is unique as it inserts into an essential gene and generates 4bp direct repeats usually not observed in HEG mobility events. In general, the rare cutting HEases with characterized target/recognition and cleavage sites with 3′ overhangs are useful in genetic engineering and genomics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicForest Insect Ecology and Management→French-language works237,207→