Not to seek gold but to paint : the British Columbian views of William G.R. Hind
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to make more meaningful sense of William G.R. Hind's achievements, this thesis will consider a number of different issues. First of all, there is the vital question of Hind's relationship to the artistic milieu of Victorian England from which he emerged. In terms of both style and choice of subject matter his work bears obvious similarities to the products of contemporary English realism. The implications of Hind's allegiance to British trends must be examined. The first chapter will concern itself with the aspirations and attitudes characteristic of Victorian British art which are most relevant to Hind's personal development. An examination of British artistic and social criticisms will provide the background necessary for a fuller comprehension of Hind's insistence on the contemporary subject, particularly the theme of the labourer and his accomplishments. The second chapter will deal with the idea of British imperialism and emigration, issues with which Hind was directly concerned. As a further step in this investigation, the role of the pictorial illustrator, along with an analysis of British and Canadian attitudes toward British Columbia as expressed in books and periodicals will be discussed. The final chapter will concern itself with Hind's British Columbian images and what they tell us about his ideology and background as a product of mid nineteenth century England. Such an approach to William G.R. Hind will make it possible for us to understand his work better within a broad social and artistic milieu.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".