PRIMA: Formando agentes multiplicadores em Gerência Pública
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Em convênio com a École Nationale d’ Administration Publique — ENAP Quebec/Canadá, o Centro de Desenvolvimento da Administração Pública — CEDAM — realizou, no mês de maio, o curso Programa Integrado de Gestão — PRIMA. O curso teve como objetivo oferecer uma oportunidade de apoio e de desenvolvimento ao processo de aperfeiçoamento de dirigentes públicos, em conformidade com as diretrizes traçadas pelo Decreto presidencial que instituiu o Sistema de Carreira (Decreto-lei n? 2.403, de 21 de dezembro de 1987). Isso porque, ao formar a primeira turma, a FUNCEP e o CEDAM dão um impulso em direção à valorização do servidor e do aperfeiçoamento da gerência pública no País, mediante a ação multiplicadora que se propagará não somente no nível do governo federal mas, também, nó nível dos governos estaduais e municipais. O PRIMA é um programa flexível e seu enfoque possibilita aos participantes a adaptação da metodologia a diferentes organizações.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".