MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2285172990 · doi:10.1007/s13659-016-0090-x

Derrisisoflavones H–K and One Isoflavan Derivative from Derris robusta

2016· article· en· W2285172990 on OpenAlexaff
Guozhu Wei, Mei-Fen Mao, Xiangmei Li, Fu‐Cai Ren, Fei Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueNatural Products and Bioprospecting · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBioactive natural compounds
Canadian institutionsFrancophone University Association
FundersNational Development and Reform Commission
KeywordsIsoflavonoidPlant biochemistryDerivative (finance)BiologyChemistryStereochemistryFlavonoidOrganic chemistryBiochemistryBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Derris is a genus belonging to the Leguminosae family with about 800 species that are widely distributed in tropical, subtropical areas of Asia and Africa [ 1 ]. Published studies have shown that the genus is a rich source of pterocarpans, flavonoids, particularly prenylated isoflavonoids and flavonoids [ 2 – 5 ] and these phytochemicals are associated with a broad spectrum of biological activities, including insecticidal, antimicrobial, cytotoxic, and antioxidant activities [ 3 – 7 ]. As part of a BioBioPha [ http://www.chemlib.cn/ ] objective to assemble a large-scale natural product library valuable in the discovery of new drug leads from nature [ 8 – 10 ], the phytochemical investigation on the twigs and leaves of Derris robusta led to the isolation of four new prenylated isoflavonoids, named derrisisoflavones H–K ( 1 – 4 ), and a new isoflavan, namely 6-hydroxyisosativan ( 5 ). This paper describes the isolation and structural elucidation of five new compounds (Fig. 1 ).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNatural Products and BioprospectingSame topicBioactive natural compoundsFrench-language works237,207