MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Impact of induction chemotherapy and adjuvant radiation therapy on outcome after extrapleural pneumonectomy for malignant pleural mesothelioma

2007· article· en· W2285196294 on OpenAlexaff
Marc de Perrot, R. Feld, Masaki Anraku, Andrea Bezjak, Ronald L. Burkes, H. Roberts, J. Cho, A. Visbal, Natasha B. Leighl, Shaf Keshavjee, Michael R. Johnston

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOccupational and environmental lung diseases
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreToronto General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineExtrapleural PneumonectomyGemcitabinePemetrexedInduction chemotherapyChemotherapyVinorelbineCisplatinMesotheliomaPneumonectomyRadiation therapySurgeryOncologyLung cancerPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

7708 Background: Examine the results of tri-modality therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Methods: Protocol consisted of induction cisplatin-based chemotherapy, followed by extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) and adjuvant hemithoracic radiation therapy (RT) to 54 Gy. Results: A total of 60 patients were suitable candidates for tri-modality therapy between 01/2001 and 01/2007. Induction chemotherapy was administered to 56 patients; 4 patients underwent EPP without induction chemotherapy because of patient refusal (n=2), previous chemotherapy (n=1) and sarcomatoid MPM (n=1). Chemotherapy included vinorelbine/cisplatin (n=26), pemetrexed/cisplatin (n=26) and gemcitabine/cisplatin (n=4). EPP was performed in 47 patients; 13 patients did not undergo EPP because of tumor progression during chemotherapy (n=2), extensive chest wall involvement at surgery (n=6), or involvement of mediastinal lymph nodes at mediastinoscopy (n=5). Three patients (6%) died within 30 days of surgery. Pathological stage was II (n=6), III (n=35), and IV (n=6). Adjuvant RT was administered postoperatively to 36 patients and is ongoing in 5 patients; 6 patients did not receive adjuvant RT because of fatigue (n=5) or previous RT (n=1), and 4 patients did not complete RT up to 54 Gy. Overall survival for the 23 patients who completed the tri-modality therapy was 37% at 3 years with a median survival of 15 months. Eleven of the 23 patients had recurrence after a median of 8 months (range, 2–13 months). Recurrences were locoregional (n=2), in contralateral chest (n=3), abdomen (n=3), contralateral chest and abdomen (n=2), or pericardium (n=1). Among patients undergoing EPP, disease-free survival was longer in patients undergoing adjuvant high dose hemithoracic RT (p=0.07), in epithelial tumors (p=0.03), and in early stage (p=0.07). Overall survival was influenced by histology (p=0.007) and stage (p=0.05), but not by adjuvant high dose hemithoracic RT (p=0.5). The type of chemotherapy had no impact on disease-free and overall survival. Conclusions: Aggressive tri-modality therapy is feasible in selected patient with MPM. Adjuvant high dose hemithoracic RT can improve disease free survival and achieve good local control. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.108
GPT teacher head0.482
Teacher spread0.374 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicOccupational and environmental lung diseasesFrench-language works237,207