BÖSCH, Sarah, Wilhelm von Humboldt in Frankreich. Studien zur Rezeption (1797-2005)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Denis Thouard 1Sans avoir atteint la renommée de son jeune frère Alexandre, Wilhelm von Humboldt ne fut pas un inconnu.Il séjourna à Paris à maintes reprises, dont de 1797 à 1801, y noua de nombreux contacts, et demeura, une fois rentré en Prusse, en échange continus avec le milieu parisien à travers la médiation active d'Alexandre.Or la réception de ses idées cessa peu après sa mort en 1835 pour ne reprendre que plus d'un siècle après, dans le contexte de la critique du paradigme structuraliste de la fin des années soixante du dernier siècle.C'est à l'histoire de cette relation changeante que s'est attachée S.B. dans un travail qui constitue un modèle d'étude de cas de « transfert culturel » et plus largement « savant » en ce qu'il dit finalement plus sur les motifs de l'accueil ou de l'indifférence que sur l'œuvre humboldtienne elle-même.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".