MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2285459746 · doi:10.4000/ces.9260

The Resilient Opacity of Vassanji’s The In-Between World of Vikram Lall

2007· article· en· W2285459746 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Françoise Král

Bibliographic record

VenueCommonwealth Essays and Studies · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPostcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeIndependence (probability theory)Perspective (graphical)NoticeVictoryHEROSociologyHistoryGender studiesPolitical scienceLawLiteratureArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vassanji’s novel The In-Between World of Vikram Lall recounts the life of its eponymous hero, and through him highlights the difficulties encountered by the South Asian community in Kenya, from the years leading up to independence to post-independence years. Part neither of the grand narrative of colonisation nor of the anti-colonial struggle, the Lalls are doomed to a de facto in-betweeness which the protagonist finds alienating. This novel is characterized by a constant shift from past to present, from the childhood years which the homodiegetic narrator remembers with a certain nostalgia to his perspective as a fully-grown up man who now lives in Canada. Yet the shift in perspective does not imply a move from innocence to experience, let alone a move from ignorance to knowledge. A strategy of partial unveiling underpins the novel on a structural, generic and metatextual level, thereby generating a certain opacity. The purpose of this partial unveiling is to bring to our notice the instrumentalisation of the South Asian community, doubly subaltern.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.023
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommonwealth Essays and StudiesSame topicPostcolonial and Cultural Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207