MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2285465287

Current geoscientific knowledge on the High Arctic submarine Alpha-Mendeleev complex

2004· article· en· W2285465287 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Wilfried Jokat, Richard Mühe

Bibliographic record

VenueHelmholtz-Zentrum für Polar-und Meeresforschung (Alfred-Wegener-Institut) · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyRidgeSeismologySubmarineBasementArcticBathymetryPaleontologyCrustSedimentary rockGeomorphologyOceanographyGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Today Alpha-Mendeleev Ridge is the largest single submarine feature in the Arctic Ocean, which geological origin is still unknown. A better understanding of the evolution of the ridge complex in relation to the opening of the Canada Basin would have profound consequences for Arctic geodynamic models. Currently models in which Alpha Ridge represents a former spreading centre or "hot spot" trail are favoured. In this contribution the state of knowledge will be reviewed.The ridge was discovered by the US ice station Alpha during its drift in the years 1957-1958, which acquired the first information on the ridges topography and sedimentary thickness. The largest single-channel seismic data set was gathered during the drift of the US ice station T-3 from February 1967 to June 1970. The width of Alpha Ridge ranges from 250 to 800 km. In bathymetric cross sections it is roughly symmetrical with greatest elevation at the centre. The existing single channel seismic reflection lines acquired from ice stations Alpha, T-3 and CESAR and ship based seismic experiments show that Alpha-Mendeleev Ridge is mainly covered by a sedimentary sequence, which can reach up to 1000 m in thickness. Along most of the profiles the sediments lie conformably on the basement. Deep seismic experiments of Canadian and Russian researchers indicate that the crust beneath the ridge has a thickness well above 30 km, and high seismic velocities above 7.0 km/s are present at lower crustal levels.The most important and complete geophysical data sets in that area are aeromagnetic and aerogravity data acquired by US and Russian researchers. The magnetic data across the Alpha Ridge indicate the presence of mostly irregular magnetic anomalies up to 2000 nT. No clear evidence of magnetic seafloor spreading anomalies has been obtained. Based on the existing geophysical data various researchers suggested that the ridge must have been formed during the Cretaceous positive polarity chron from 124 to 83 Ma, if the irregular magnetic anomalies are due to oceanic basalts. At three locations Cretaceous and Early Cenozoic sediments were recovered from western part of Alpha-Mendeleev Ridge. Two volcanic rock samples were dredged from the Alpha-Mendeleev Ridge. One of them could be dated to 83 Ma. So far, all existing geoscientific data support a formation of this complex in Cretaceous times. However, details on the responsible processes and the plate movements during this period are rather hypothetical.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.564
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHelmholtz-Zentrum für Polar-und Meeresforschung (Alfred-Wegener-Institut)Same topicGeological Studies and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207