Edaphic ascid mites (Acari: Mesostigmata: Ascidae) from the state of São Paulo, Brazil, with description of five new species
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper reports the occurrence of 11 species of edaphic mites of the family Ascidae collected from soil and litter in southeastern Brazil. Five are new to science, namely Cheiroseius neophalangioides sp. nov., Gamasellodes magniventris sp. nov., Lasioseius latinoamericanus sp. nov., Proctolaelaps paulista sp. nov. and Protogamasellus sigillophorus sp. nov.. Among the other species collected, diagnoses and collection data are provided for Asca garmani Hurlbutt, 1963, Blattisocius tarsalis (Berlese, 1918), Proctolaelaps diffissus Karg, 1976 and Protogamasellus mica (Athias-Henriot, 1961 ); these are the first Brazilian collection records for these species other than B. tarsalis in stored products. Lasioseius helvetius Chant, 1958 is considered a senior synonym of L. saltatus Karg, 1980 (new synonymy), the latter reported previously from Brazil. Lasioseius quinisetosus Lindquist & Karg, 2006 (= Cheiroseius inguinalis Karg, 1977) is newly recorded from Brazil. Diagnoses and redescriptions are provided for L. helvetius and L. quinisetosus. Proctolaelaps intermedius Athias-Henriot, 1959 is considered a senior synonym of P. orientalis (Chant, 1963) and P. wenkochingi “(Samšinák, 1964)” (new synonymies).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".