MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2285499866

Pennsylvanian emergence of anabranching fluvial deposits: the parallel rise of arborescent vegetation and fixed-channel floodplains

2011· article· en· W2285499866 on OpenAlexaffabout
Neil S. Davies, Martin R. Gibling

Bibliographic record

VenueGhent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFluvialGeologyPaleontologyPennsylvanianDevonianCarboniferousFloodplainFaciesGeomorphologyStructural basinGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Anabranching (anastomosing) rivers are low-energy fluvial systems consisting of multiple channels separated by stable islands which evolve over time through avulsion. Such river systems host a variety of terrestrial sub-environments and habitats that have been relatively common during the Mesozoic and Cenozoic and into the present day. Anabranching requires bank stability, usually provided by vegetation or cohesive floodplain muds, both of which were prominent in the fluvial realm by the Siluro-Devonian. However, based on a literature review of 144 Cambrian–Devonian and 188 Carboniferous fluvial successions, facies interpreted as anabranching river deposits do not appear in abundance until the Pennsylvanian (Bashkirian). Original field data from Carboniferous fluvial strata in Atlantic Canada and the SW USA support the assertion that a distinct suite of fluvial facies and sandbody geometries, still apparent in recent anabranching fluvial deposits, makes its first appearance at about this time. The channel deposits are narrow (width: thickness typically <15) with steep margins and aggradational fills, with little evidence for lateral accretion, and encased in floodplain muds with paleosols. Although it is rarely possible to demonstrate that the parent channels formed 3D networks, it is probable that some suites were anabranching. Although a few small, narrow channel bodies are known from Devonian and Mississippian formations, this “fixed-channel” style is conspicuously absent from older fluvial formations but is widespread from the Pennsylvanian onwards. It is argued that the seemingly delayed appearance of this fluvial style in part reflects the infrequency of repeated shortterm triggers for avulsion prior to a threshold-crossing increase in arborescent floodplain vegetation. The increase in arborescent vegetation through the Carboniferous would have resulted in an increase in the size, abundance, and distribution of large woody debris in fluvial channels. Such debris would have provided, for the first time, one of the most common triggers for river avulsion; as demonstrated by the fact that large log-jam deposits also first appear in the rock record during the Bashkirian.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGhent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University)Same topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207