Relire l’« Esquisse » du point de vue métapsychologique de la fonction maternelle1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article explores the genesis of psychic life prior to the establishment of internal objects, beginning with fetal development and passing through the early constitution of precocious parent–child relationships. Freud’s “Project” (1895) serves as the basis for integrating the physiological foundations of psychic life and the constancy principle. The author combines his research in infant observation, following the Esther Bick method, his recent work on mentalization and the reflective function in children and adults, and his research on the relationship between the psyche and the body. From these approaches, a common denominator is extracted, involving the importance of rhythm, sensoriality, and elements of emotional and physiological regulation. They relate to a specific aspect of the constancy principle, supported by the maternal function in the course of analytic treatment, which has important consequences for the management of the transference and countertransference. To illustrate these ideas, the author has drawn three clinical vignettes from his hospital practice with children and their parents, and his private practice in psychoanalysis and psychotherapy with adult patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.026 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".