MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2285621910

Statement about the protection and promotion of cultural diversity in the digital era

2013· article· en· W2285621910 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueORBi (University of Liège) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMedia and Digital Communication
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroUniversidad Complutense de MadridGeneralitat de CatalunyaUniversidad Carlos III de MadridUniversité de Technologie de CompiègneUniversité du Québec à Montréal
KeywordsDiversity (politics)Promotion (chess)Library scienceStatement (logic)Political sciencePublic relationsCultural diversityPlan (archaeology)SociologyGeographyLawComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The international workshop “Protection and promotion of audiovisual diversity in the digital era” took place on October 3rd and 4th, 2013 at the Getafe campus of the Universidad Carlos III of Madrid. It was coordinated by Professor Luis A. Albornoz and Professor Ana I. Segovia and organized by the participants in the Project “Cultural diversity and the audiovisual sectors: good practices and indicators” (ref. CSO2011-26241), which is part of the National Plan of Scientific Research, Development and Technological Innovation in Spain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.800
Threshold uncertainty score0.224

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it