MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Phase I Study Of Nilotinib As a c-Kit Inhibitor Combined With Re-Induction Chemotherapy For Relapsed and Refractory c-Kit Positive Acute Myeloid Leukemia

2013· article· en· W2285786982 on OpenAlexaff
Joseph Brandwein, David W. Hedley, Sue Chow, Karen Yee, Andre C. Schuh, Vikas Gupta, Aaron D. Schimmer, Mark D. Minden

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCytarabineMedicineNilotinibEtoposideMitoxantroneInternal medicineGastroenterologyMyeloid leukemiaRefractory (planetary science)ChemotherapyPhases of clinical researchPharmacologyImatinib

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background A previous study in relapsed/refractory AML, combining re-induction chemotherapy with imatinib as a c-kit inhibitor, demonstrated that effective inhibition of downstream pAkt was associated with a higher CR rate (Brandwein et al, 2011). Nilotinib is also a c-kit inhibitor which diffuses into cells and is therefore not affected by potential defects in active cellular influx mechanisms. Methods Patients age 18-65 with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who had persistent leukemia after 3+7 induction with cytarabine and daunorubicin, or relapsed within 24 months of achieving CR, and whose blasts were c-kit (CD117) positive, were enrolled in a phase I clinical trial with nilotinib on Days 1-12 combined with mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2/day IV Days 6-10, etoposide 100 mg/m2/day IV Days 6-10 and cytarabine 1.5 g/m2 IV q12h x 4 doses on Days 11-12. None of the cases harbored c-kit mutations. Nilotinib was escalated through 2 dose levels (400 mg daily and 400 mg BID) in successive 6 patient cohorts; up to 2/6 dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were permitted. Results At the 400 mg once daily nilotinib dose there were 2 DLTs, both hematologic and consisting of prolonged platelet and neutrophil recovery. At the 400 mg BID dose there was one DLT, consisting of grade 3 transient liver enzyme elevation; 5/6 patients experienced transient grade I-II bilirubin elevations at this dose. The median time to ANC > 0.5 x109/L was 38 days (range 28-54) and to platelets > 20 x109/L was 30 days (range 28-54). Complete responses were seen in 10 patients, 5/6 at each dose level. AML blasts from peripheral blood were assayed for pAKT, pERK and pS6 by flow cytometry, after stimulation with stem cell factor (SCF), on Days 1 and 6, pre- and 1.5 and 3 hours post-nilotinib dosing on each day. A decrease in the level of SCF-stimulated pAkt of at least 50% on Day 6 post-nilotinib, as compared to baseline, was seen in 1/6 patients at the 400 mg BID dose; the remaining 11 cases did not demonstrate an appreciable decrease in pAkt and other intermediates as compared to pre-nilotinib levels. Ex vivo dose titration curves showed that nilotinib inhibited c-kit mediated ERK and Akt activation in the blast cells of all cases, but concentrations >10 micromolar were needed to produce 50% inhibition in most cases. Conclusions The results indicate that nilotinib can be safely combined with this re-induction chemotherapy regimen, at doses up to 400 mg BID. Although the CR rate was high, in most cases nilotinib did not demonstrate significant inhibition of the c-kit pathway in leukemia cells in vivo. Dose titration curves showed that concentrations needed to produce 50% inhibition were generally above those achievable in vivo. Disclosures: Brandwein: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Off Label Use: nilotinib for acute myeloid leukemia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicChronic Myeloid Leukemia TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207