Thermal balance of invessel composting of tomato plant residues
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ghaly, A.E., Alkoaik, F. and Snow, A. 2006. Thermal balance of invessel composting of tomato plant residues. Canadian Biosystems Engineering/Le genie des biosystemes au Canada 48: 6.1 6.11. Heat and mass balances were performed on an insulated laboratory composting bioreactor operating on tomato plant residues. Wood shavings and municipal solid compost were used as a bulking agent and an inoculum, respectively. The moisture content and C:N ratio were maintained at 60% and 30:1, respectively. The temperature peaked after 31 h of operation reaching 63.3°C and lasted for 9 h. The result of the thermal analysis indicated that the average heat production value was 14.6 MJ/kg DM degraded. The conductive heat losses through the cylindrical body and the sidewalls of the bioreactor accounted for 30.0% of the total cumulative heat produced, whereas the heat loss due to aeration accounted for 61.0% and the heat gained by the compost and bioreactor materials accounted for the remaining 9.0%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".