MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Numerical investigation of the formation of Trichel pulses in a needle-plane geometry

2015· article· en· W2285963582 on OpenAlexafffund
Peyman Dordizadeh, Kazimierz Adamiak, G.S.P. Castle

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics D Applied Physics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaZhejiang UniversityCMC Microsystems
KeywordsGeometryPlane (geometry)Materials scienceMechanicsPhysicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a numerical investigation of the formation of the Trichel pulses in negative dc corona discharge for a needle-plane configuration in atmospheric air. A 2D axisymmetric model of the problem considering three charged species and consisting of a hyperboloid needle with a tip radius of 35 μ m and needle-plane spacing of 6 mm over the voltage range of −3.5 kV to −12 kV has been studied. A commercial finite element package COMSOL was used for simultaneously solving three convection-diffusion equations along with Poisson’s equation. In order to obtain a better understanding of the processes which lead to the pulse formation, a close look is taken at one of the pulses. The distributions of the major charged species and the timeline of peak-values of charged species densities and electric field are presented. Through tracing the evolution of the locations of the peak densities of the charged species some new insights have been provided. The configuration of the model was chosen so that the simulation results could be compared with the experimental data published by Lama and Gallo. The numerical results were in acceptable agreement with the experimental values. Some explanations are given for the discrepancies between experimental and simulation results. It is also shown, that as the frequency of the pulses increases with voltage, the transition from Trichel pulse discharge to glow discharge initiates and full glow discharge is reached at −12 kV.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations119
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics D Applied PhysicsSame topicAerosol Filtration and Electrostatic PrecipitationFrench-language works237,207