MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2286135932

The Development of Ni1-x-yCuxMgyO-SDC Anode for Intermediate Temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cells (IT-SOFCs)

2010· dissertation· en· W2286135932 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Monrudee Phongaksorn

Bibliographic record

VenueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2010
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEnergy Policy and Planning OfficeMinistry of Energy, ThailandKing Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok
KeywordsOxideFuel cellsAnodeMaterials scienceSolid oxide fuel cellChemical engineeringNuclear engineeringMetallurgyChemistryEngineeringPhysical chemistryElectrode
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) conventionally operate between 800 and 1000°C. The barriers for full-scale commercialization of SOFCs are the high cost and relatively poor long-term stability due to the high temperatures used in current state-of-the-art SOFCs. One solution is to decrease the operating temperature, e.g. to 550-750°C but this requires developing new electrolytes and electrode materials. Also, to increase efficiency and practicality, the anode should be able to internally reform hydrocarbon fuels especially methane because it is the most common hydrocarbon in natural gas. \nThe overall goal of this research is to develop a coke-tolerant Ni1-x-yCuxMgyO-SDC anode for methane fuelled IT-SOFCs. The Ni-Cu-Mg-O-SDC anode has been chosen based on the premises that doped-ceria is suitable for intermediate operating temperatures (550-800°C), Ni is known as an active metal and good electronic conductor, Cu increases resistance to coking, MgO helps prevent agglomeration of Ni during reduction, and finally SDC improves oxide ion transport to the cell at this intermediate temperature range. In this work, these materials were characterized in three primary ways: material physical and chemical properties, methane steam reforming activity and electrochemical performance. \nTwo different methods have been used to add Cu to Ni1-yMgyO: a one-step co-precipitation method and a two-step co-precipitation/impregnation method. For the first method, Ni1-x-yCuxMgyO was synthesized via co-precipitation of Ni, Mg and Cu. In the two-step method, Ni0.9Mg0.1O was first prepared by co-precipitation, followed by addition of copper to Ni0.9Mg0.1O by impregnation. However, co-precipitation of all metal in one step limits the sintering temperature of the anode in the cell fabrication due to the low boiling point of CuO. Therefore, co-precipitation of Cu is not a practical method and only Cu impregnation should be considered for practical SOFC applications. \nIt was found that the addition of Mg (Ni0.9Mg0.1O) lowers the reducibility of NiO. Addition of Cu to Ni0.9Mg0.1O up to 5% shows similar reducibility as Ni0.9Mg0.1O. The reducibility of Ni1-x-yCuxMgyO becomes lower when the Cu content is increased to 10%. Nonetheless, all materials are fully reduced at 750ºC. The XRD patterns of pure NiO, Ni0.9Mg0.1O, and the Cu-containing material when Cu is less than 10 mol% are similar. The lower reducibility of Ni-Mg-O and Ni-Cu-Mg-O compared to NiO indicates that they form a solid solution with NiO as the matrix. \nSolid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) conventionally operate between 800 and 1000°C. The barriers for full-scale commercialization of SOFCs are the high cost and relatively poor long-term stability due to the high temperatures used in current state-of-the-art SOFCs. One solution is to decrease the operating temperature, e.g. to 550-750°C but this requires developing new electrolytes and electrode materials. Also, to increase efficiency and practicality, the anode should be able to internally reform hydrocarbon fuels especially methane because it is the most common hydrocarbon in natural gas. \nThe overall goal of this research is to develop a coke-tolerant Ni1-x-yCuxMgyO-SDC anode for methane fuelled IT-SOFCs. The Ni-Cu-Mg-O-SDC anode has been chosen based on the premises that doped-ceria is suitable for intermediate operating temperatures (550-800°C), Ni is known as an active metal and good electronic conductor, Cu increases resistance to coking, MgO helps prevent agglomeration of Ni during reduction, and finally SDC improves oxide ion transport to the cell at this intermediate temperature range. In this work, these materials were characterized in three primary ways: material physical and chemical properties, methane steam reforming activity and electrochemical performance. \nTwo different methods have been used to add Cu to Ni1-yMgyO: a one-step co-precipitation method and a two-step co-precipitation/impregnation method. For the first method, Ni1-x-yCuxMgyO was synthesized via co-precipitation of Ni, Mg and Cu. In the two-step method, Ni0.9Mg0.1O was first prepared by co-precipitation, followed by addition of copper to Ni0.9Mg0.1O by impregnation. However, co-precipitation of all metal in one step limits the sintering temperature of the anode in the cell fabrication due to the low boiling point of CuO. Therefore, co-precipitation of Cu is not a practical method and only Cu impregnation should be considered for practical SOFC applications. \nIt was found that the addition of Mg (Ni0.9Mg0.1O) lowers the reducibility of NiO. Addition of Cu to Ni0.9Mg0.1O up to 5% shows similar reducibility as Ni0.9Mg0.1O. The reducibility of Ni1-x-yCuxMgyO becomes lower when the Cu content is increased to 10%. Nonetheless, all materials are fully reduced at 750ºC. The XRD patterns of pure NiO, Ni0.9Mg0.1O, and the Cu-containing material when Cu is less than 10 mol% are similar. The lower reducibility of Ni-Mg-O and Ni-Cu-Mg-O compared to NiO indicates that they form a solid solution with NiO as the matrix. \nAddition of Mg also lowers the BET specific surface area from 11.5 m2/g for NiO:SDC to 10.4 m2/g for Ni0.9Mg0.1O. The surface area is further reduced when Cu is added; for example, at 10% Cu, the surface area is 8.2 m2/g. \nThe activity of 50wt% Ni1-x-yCuxMgyO/50wt% SDC samples for methane steam reforming (SMR) and water-gas-shift reaction (WGS) was evaluated in a fully automated catalytic fixed-bed reactor where the exiting gases were analyzed online by a gas chromatograph (GC). The tests were performed at steam-to-carbon ratios (S/C) of 3, 2 and 1, and at temperatures of 750°C and 650°C for twenty hours. Higher methane conversions were obtained at the higher temperature and higher S/C ratio. \nHigher methane conversion are obtained using NiO:SDC and Ni0.9Mg0.1O:SDC than Ni-Cu-Mg-O. The conversion decreases with increasing Cu content. Over NiO:SDC and Ni0.9Mg0.1O:SDC the methane conversions are the same; for example 85% at 750°C for S/C of 3. At the same conditions, impregnation of 5%Cu and 10%Cu yields lower conversions: 62% and 48%, respectively. \nThe activity for the WGS reaction was determined by mornitoring CO2/(CO+CO2) ratio. As expected because WGS is a moderately exothermic reaction, this ratio decreases when increasing the temperature. However, the CO2/(CO+CO2) ratio increases with higher S/C. The results indicate that adding Mg does not affect the WGS activity of NiO. The WGS activity of Ni0.9Mg0.1O:SDC is higher when Cu is added. The effect of additional Cu is more pronounced at 650ºC. At 750°C, changing the amount of Cu does not change the WGS activity because the WGS reaction rapidly reaches equilibrium at this high temperature. \nAt 750°C for S/C of 1, carbon filaments were found in all samples. At 650ºC, different types of deposited carbon were observed: carbon fibers and thin graphite layers. Spent NiO:SDC had the longest carbon fibers. Addition of Mg significantly reduced the formation of carbon fibers. Impregnating 5% Cu on Ni0.9Mg0.1O:SDC did not change the type of deposited carbon. Monitoring the amount of deposited carbon on Ni0.9Mg0.1O:SDC, 3%Cu and 5%Cu impregnated on Ni0.9Mg0.1O:SDC for S/C of 0 at 750ºC showed that Cu addition deactivated methane cracking causing a reduction in the amount of carbon deposited. \nElectrochemical performance in the presence of dry and humidified hydrogen was determined at 600, 650, 700 and 750ºC. Electrolyte-supported cells constructed with four different anodes were tested using polarization curve and electrochemical impedance spectra. The four anodes were NiO:SDC, Ni0.9Mg0.1O:SDC, 3%Cu and 5%Cu on Ni0.9Mg0.1O:SDC. Adding Mg improved the maximum power density from 356 mW.cm-2 with NiO:SDC to 369 mW.cm-2 with Ni0.9Mg0.1O:SDC at 750ºC in dry hydrogen. Addition of Cu, on the other hand, lowered the maximum power density to 325 mW.cm-2 with 3%Cu impregnated and to 303 mW.cm-2 with 5% Cu impregnated. \nThe cell with Ni0.9Mg0.1O:SDC was also tested under dry methane. To minimize methane cracking under this extreme condition, a current density of 0.10 A.cm-2 was always drawn when methane was present in the feed. The voltage decreased during the first hour from 0.8 to 0.5 V, then remained stable for 10 hours, and then started to drop again. Many small cracks were observed on the anode after completion of the electrochemical test, but there was no evidence of much carbon being deposited. In addition to dry methane, tests were also carried out, using the same material, with a H2O/CH4 mixture of 1/6 in order to generate a polarization curve at 750°C. Under these conditions, the maximum power density was 226 mW.cm-2. This is lower than the maximum power density obtained with humidified hydrogen, which was 362 mW.cm-2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)Same topicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel CellsFrench-language works237,207