Experiencia de investigación colaborativa: un exitoso caso de intercambio internacional y multidisciplinario de conocimientos entre investigadores de Paraguay y Canadá
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este articulo relata la experiencia de colaboracion e intercambio multidisciplinario en un proyecto de investigacion, realizado en Paraguay, denominado: Alimentacion, agricultura y formas de vida rurales en una comunidad del distrito de Piribebuy . En el trabajo colaboraron una antropologa canadiense y tres profesoras paraguayas. En el proceso de la implementacion y desarrollo del proyecto se han aprendido valiosas lecciones acerca del trabajo conjunto y de gerenciar un equipo multidisciplinario e internacional. La principal intension de este articulo es reflejar dicho proceso de trabajo conjunto, los factores que determinan el exito en una experiencia de intercambio internacional, y algunos desafios.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it