MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2286209798 · doi:10.3384/lic.diva-125289

Thin Film Synthesis of New Nanolaminated Ternary Carbides

2016· book· en· W2286209798 on OpenAlexaff
Chung‐Chuan Lai

Bibliographic record

VenueLinköping University Electronic Press eBooks · 2016
Typebook
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMXene and MAX Phase Materials
Canadian institutionsEngineering Link (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceThin filmTernary operationCarbideX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyCrystal structureComposite materialCrystallographyNanotechnologyChemical engineeringChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ternary transition metal carbides with inherently nanolaminated crystal structure are a class of materials with typically higher damage tolerance, better machinability and lower brittleness compared to the binary counterparts, yet retaining their satisfactory electrical and thermal conductivity.Their interesting properties can be related to the laminated structure.Though studies of their properties based on calculations and bulk materials have suggested potential thin film applications, such as high temperature hard coatings and electrical contacts, a relatively small number of these phases have been synthesized as thin films.Investigation of thin film deposition of these inherently nanolaminated materials further the understanding of their phase formation and crystal growth.Motivated by predicted superconductivity and thermoelectric properties of molybdenum carbides and related layered molybdenum compounds, nanolaminated materials in the Mo-Ga-C ternary system were studied.Apart from the previously reported Mo2GaC, a new layered carbide, Mo2Ga2C, was synthesized in both thin film and bulk form with a postulated crystal structure related to Mo2GaC.The proposed structure was further validated by first principles

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLinköping University Electronic Press eBooksSame topicMXene and MAX Phase MaterialsFrench-language works237,207