LA PROTECTION JURIDIQUE DU FOLKLORE DANS LES ÉTATS MEMBRES DE L’ORGANISATION AFRICAINE DE LA PROPRIÉTÉ INTELLECTUELLE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’Accord de Bangui, loi supranationale des États membres de l’Organisation africaine de la propriété intellectuelle (OAPI), régit aussi bien le droit de la propriété industrielle que le droit de la propriété intellectuelle. Alors que la réglementation des objets protégés par le droit d’auteur se rapproche beaucoup plus des standards appliqués au niveau international, le folklore qui est l’objet de notre étude bénéficie d’un régime particulier. En effet, les pays de l’OAPI, grâce à l’Accord de Bangui révisé, ont établi une protection sui generis pour les expressions culturelles traditionnelles ou des expressions du folklore. Cette soumission du folklore à des règles particulières est l’objet de vives controverses. Néanmoins, même si cette protection particulière du folklore comporte intrinsèquement des limites, elle s’adapte mieux aux manifestations du folklore qui sont ondoyantes, diverses et variées.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".