MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2286335811

La topique de l'intersubjectivité chez Kaës et ses incidences dans l’écoute psychanalytique et dans la relation transféro/contretransférentielle dans la cure-type

2014· article· fr· W2286335811 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian journal of psychoanalysis · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFreudian slipPsychoanalysisPsychicSubject (documents)Unconscious mindPsychologyPsychoanalytic theoryIntersubjectivityPhilosophyRelation (database)HumanitiesEpistemologyMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The author presents the work of Rene Kaes, and his main concepts of psychic groupality, the group, the subject of the group, and the bonds between the subjects of the group. The theory of the intersubjectivity proposed by Kaes, which he calls the third topic, does not exclude Freudian’s first and second Topics. All human bonds are made of unconscious alliances of narcissistic, denied perverse contracts, in service of the survival of the subjects and of the group. The author presents the consequences of those unconscious alliances and contracts on the psychoanalytic listening of a singular subject in the “cure-type,” and on the relationship of the analyst-patient couple.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.579
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it