MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2286341552 · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2016.02.001

Atypical Teratoid/Rhabdoid Tumors Are Comprised of Three Epigenetic Subgroups with Distinct Enhancer Landscapes

2016· article· en· W2286341552 on OpenAlexaff
Pascal D. Johann, Serap Erkek, Marc Zapatka, Kornelius Kerl, Ivo Buchhalter, Volker Hovestadt, David Jones, Dominik Sturm, Carl Hermann, Maia Segura‐Wang, Andrey Korshunov, Marina Rhyzova, Susanne Gröbner, Sebastian Brabetz, Lukas Chávez, Susanne Bens, Stefan Gröschel, Fabian Kratochwil, Andrea Wittmann, Laura Sieber, Christina Geörg, Stefan Wolf, Katja Beck, Florian Oyen, David Capper, Peter van Sluis, Richard Volckmann, Jan Köster, Rogier Versteeg, Andreas von Deimling, Till Milde, Olaf Witt, Andreas E. Kulozik, Martin Ebinger, Tarek Shalaby, Michael A. Grotzer, David Sumerauer, Josef Zámečnı́k, Jaume Mora, Nada Jabado, Michael D. Taylor, Annie Huang, Eleonora Aronica, Anna Bertoni, Bernhard Radlwimmer, Torsten Pietsch, Ulrich Schüller, Reinhard Schneppenheim, Paul A. Northcott, Jan O. Korbel, Reiner Siebert, Michael C. Frühwald, Peter Lichter, Roland Eils, Amar Gajjar, Martin Hasselblatt, Stefan M. Pfister, Marcel Kool

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Cell · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicChromatin Remodeling and Cancer
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenSickKids FoundationUniversity of TorontoMcGill University Health Centre
FundersHeidelberger Zentrum für Personalisierte Onkologie Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum In Der Helmholtz-GemeinschaftDeutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
KeywordsAtypical teratoid rhabdoid tumorSMARCB1BiologyEpigeneticsDNA methylationGeneticsEnhancerChromatinEpigenomicsCancer researchGeneChromatin remodelingGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations575
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueCancer CellSame topicChromatin Remodeling and CancerFrench-language works237,207