Exercise and pregnancy: focus on advice for the competitive and elite athlete
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Athletes’ safety is a top priority of the IOC, and the IOC Medical and Scientific Commission aims to reach evidence-based consensus on debatable topics. There are several guidelines regarding physical activity and exercise during pregnancy and postpartum period (American College of Obstetrician and Gynecologists, Canadian Society of Exercise Physiologists and Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologist of Canada, American College of Sports Medicine, The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists). However, until the IOC consensus meeting in September 2015, there was not any consensus statement on “Exercise in Pregnancy and the Post-partum Period in elite sports particularly for High-level Athletes”.1 The IOC consensus meeting had two aims: (1) to comprehensively review risk factors related to different physical and physiological states of a pregnant athlete and (2) to provide recommendations for training and competing during pregnancy and postpartum period for high levels athletes. As IOC President Bach emphasised, “Sport is not just …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".