MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2286424156

Abstract: Controlling mechanisms for dyke emplacement and fluid flow around strike-slip faults in the Campbellton region, northern New Brunswick

2011· article· en· W2286424156 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Simon D. Craggs

Bibliographic record

VenueAtlantic Geology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyBeddingSlip (aerodynamics)PetrologySeismologyFault (geology)Strike-slip tectonicsSedimentary rockStress fieldMagmaEchelon formationUltimate tensile strengthIgneous rockBedGeochemistryAnisotropyVolcano
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a strike-slip regime, the bulk compressive stresses are near horizontal, and as such there has been much debate about the space generating mechanism required for magma emplacement. In the Campbellton region of New Brunswick numerous intermediate, fineto medium-grained sheets intrude Late Ordovician to Late Silurian, sedimentary rocks and Early Devonian, subvolcanic to subaerial igneous rocks. Intrusions are most prevalent proximal to regional-scale, strike-slip faults where cross-cutting relationships indicate coeval magma emplacement and fault displacement. In sedimentary rocks, intrusions are typically oriented along a pre-existing fabric (bedding) along which abundant bedding-parallel slip has occurred. Analysis of fault orientation and movement history allows for an approximation of the far-field stress directions, with σ1 oriented WNW-ESE. Traditional theories on magma emplacement in strike-slip regimes suggest that magma should orient itself perpendicular to the maximum tensile stress. However, in the study area, this is uniformly not apparent with all intrusions oriented oblique to, or parallel with, far-field σ3. It is very difficult for a dyke to intrude a pre-existing fracture that is misaligned with σ3 unless the resolved shear stress on the plane is small relative to excess magma pressure, or the effective dyke-normal stress is small relative to the rock tensile strength. Without these conditions the magma will propagate into a selfgenerated crack perpendicular to σ3. During mode I-II fracture propagation, maximum tensile stress occurs at the dyke tip and parallel to the dyke; thus, if the tensile stress exceeds the tensile strength of the rock, the dyke cannot propagate into the pre-existing plane. However, for mode I-III fractures effective tension at a dyke tip is significantly lower and may allow propagation along the pre-existing front. The Campbellton region experienced a transpressive stress regime during dyke emplacement and thus fracture propagation was dominantly mode IIII. In addition, during major fault development, subsidiary fracture propagation can significantly alter stress trajectories around the parent fault and introduce local dilatant zones that are misaligned with far-field σ3. As such, the combination of a far-field transpressive stress regime and local stress perturbations are considered feasible mechanisms for controlling dyke orientation around major displacement surfaces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.489
Threshold uncertainty score0.984

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAtlantic GeologySame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207