MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2286609364 · doi:10.5555/2034396.2034427

Basis function discovery using spectral clustering and bisimulation metrics

2011· article· en· W2286609364 on OpenAlexaff
Gheorghe Comanici, Doina Precup

Bibliographic record

VenueAdaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicReinforcement Learning in Robotics
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMarkov decision processCluster analysisSet (abstract data type)Bellman equationState spaceFeature (linguistics)Function (biology)Artificial intelligenceState (computer science)Markov processFeature vectorBasis (linear algebra)Markov chainFocus (optics)Machine learningQuality (philosophy)Mathematical optimizationAlgorithmMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) are a powerful framework for modeling sequential decision making for intelligent agents acting in stochastic environments. One of the important challenges facing such agents in practical applications is finding a suitable way to represent the state space, so that a good way of behaving can be learned efficiently. In this paper, we focus on learning a good policy when function approximation must be used to represent the value function. In this case, states are mapped into feature vectors, and a set of parameters is learned, which allows us to approximate the value of any given state. Theoretically, the quality of the approximation that can be obtained depends on the set of features. In practice, the feature set affects not only the quality of the solution obtained, but also the speed of learning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.850
Threshold uncertainty score0.807

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.149
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.137 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdaptive Agents and Multi-Agents SystemsSame topicReinforcement Learning in RoboticsFrench-language works237,207