MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2286695207 · doi:10.1109/vtcfall.2015.7390916

Energy Allocation for Sensing and Transmission in WSNs with Energy Harvesting Tx/Rx

2015· article· en· W2286695207 on OpenAlexaff
Amina Hentati, Fatma Abdelkefi, Wessam Ajib

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceEnergy harvestingTransmitterEnergy (signal processing)ThroughputFadingTransmission (telecommunications)Wireless sensor networkHeuristicChannel (broadcasting)Channel state informationData transmissionEnergy consumptionWirelessComputer networkMathematical optimizationTelecommunicationsEngineeringElectrical engineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper studies the energy allocation for sensing and data transmitting in communication systems with energy harvesting sensor nodes. The investigated system consists of a point-to-point data transmission between two energy harvesting nodes that have limited batteries capacity and communicating over a wireless fading channel. The transmitter aims to optimize the throughput over slotted system and in an infinite horizon subject to time-varying conditions. These conditions include the energy harvested at both nodes, available energy at both nodes and the channel state. The energy allocation problem is formulated as a sequential decision problem. An optimal algorithm is given and a low-complexity suboptimal energy allocation algorithm is also proposed. Simulation results show the gain when the transmitter takes into account the state of energy at the receiver and that the proposed heuristic algorithm achieves near-optimal number of transmitted bits with lower complexity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless NetworksFrench-language works237,207