MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2286784034 · doi:10.6342/ntu.2013.01537

臺灣原住民族比例進用制度之政經分析,2001-2012

2013· article· zh· W2286784034 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venue臺灣大學政治學研究所學位論文 · 2013
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiverse Topics in Contemporary Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousObligationGovernment (linguistics)PromulgationProcurementGovernment procurementPublic administrationBusinessPolitical scienceLawEconomic growthEconomicsMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Government Procurement Act came into force as of the date of its promulgation in 1988, and according to Article 98 of the act, the way of the motivation of hiring the disabled and the indigenous with obligation for a winning tenderer is a minimum of two percent of the total number of employees. After that, the Indigenous Peoples Employment Rights Protection Act was proclaimed in 2001, and the protection of indigenous percentage employment in government procurement system that the indigenous employees should comprise at least 1% of the total employees is prescribed by Article 12 of the indigenous people employment rights protect act. Since the implementation of Article 88 of the government procurement act in 1998 and Article 12 of the indigenous peoples employment rights protection act in 2001, it has encountered problems and issues of law and to deal with disagreement and resistance because there have been too many levels, units, and organizations involved in the process of the implementation. The first purpose of this research focuses on the changes of the indigenous employment protection systems in Taiwan. Second, I probe into the contents, the process of implementation, and the consequences of the indigenous percentage employment in the two laws from 2001 to 2012 by the data I collected. Third, I analyze the issues and the precedents of administrative appeals and lawsuits of indigenous percentage employment in public and private sectors. Fourth, I gather information about the systems of indigenous protection employment from the United States, Canada, New Zealand, and Australia. Finally, I propose recommendations about law amending of the indigenous percentage employment in the two laws and the indigenous employment policies in the future. According to the analysis and results in my research, the concerns of the attributes of indigenous people, and the social changes nowadays, the research recommendations are as follows: 1.The government should amend laws in the direction of increasing the numbers of long-term and stable jobs for indigenous people. 2.The government should establish a comprehensive system of employment matching and human resources survey. 3.The government should devote itself to cultivating every aspect of talent in the labor market and encourage indigenous people to enroll and to engage in advanced studies. 4.To integrate tribes’ resources and to promote the employment status of indigenous peoples. 5. To shape the culture of entrepreneurship of indigenous youth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.561
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0870.064

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.141
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it