MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2286865293 · doi:10.7202/1033524ar

La collection muséale et la variabilité de l’oeuvre : échantillon de pratiques et rôle de l’artiste

2015· article· fr· W2286865293 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Véronique Rodriguez

Bibliographic record

VenueMuséologies Les cahiers d études supérieures · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pour de nombreux artistes, les années 1960 marquent un tournant dans leur pratique au cours duquel ils choisissent de délaisser les médias de création traditionnels : gravure, peinture ou sculpture pour se tourner vers de nouveaux médiums au caractère variable : la performance, l’installation ou la vidéo. L’entrée de ces oeuvres dans les collections muséales entraîne son lot de changements. En analysant et comparant les pratiques au sein de deux institutions nationales, l’une au Québec (MBAQ) et l’autre en Suisse (Mamco), Rodriguez démontre que l’authenticité de l’oeuvre ne repose plus uniquement sur sa matérialité, mais bien sur l’intention de l’artiste, devenue une valeur culte.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.777
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.151
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMuséologies Les cahiers d études supérieuresSame topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207