MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2286880570 · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/28/6/066001

Inter and intra macro-cell model for point dipole–dipole energy calculations

2016· article· en· W2286880570 on OpenAlexfundno aff
G J Bowden, Gavin B. G. Stenning, G. van der Laan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Condensed Matter · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic properties of thin films
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of SouthamptonYork University
KeywordsDipolePhysicsMagnetic dipoleMacroDiscrete dipole approximationPoint (geometry)Range (aeronautics)Electric dipole transitionEnergy (signal processing)MicromagneticsField (mathematics)Computational physicsMagnetic fieldMaterials scienceComputer scienceGeometryQuantum mechanicsMathematicsMagnetization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the field of micromagnetics, the calculation of long-range dipole-dipole interactions in non-uniformly magnetized bodies has long posed computational problems. In this paper, we present an inter and intra macro-cell point-dipole model, which can be used to speed-up the determination of dipole-dipole energies at the atomistic level. The model can be used to accurately compute the dipole-dipole energy, using macro-cells of any shape or size.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.879
Threshold uncertainty score0.942

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Condensed MatterSame topicMagnetic properties of thin filmsFrench-language works237,207