MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2287063714 · doi:10.1109/cw.2015.30

A Novel Index-Based Rank Fusion Method for Occluded Ear Recognition

2015· article· en· W2287063714 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBiometric Identification and Security
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceHeadphonesBiometricsComputer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)Feature extractionOcclusionIdentification (biology)FusionComputer visionFeature (linguistics)Speech recognitionEngineeringMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ear biometrics are often partially or fully occluded by hair, earrings, headphones, hat/cap, scarf, and other obstacles. Occurrence of occlusion during identification stage may cause significant information loss, which deteriorates recognition performance. In this paper, we proposed a novel index-based rank fusion method for ear recognition that can utilize occlusion information adaptively during identification stage to decide on a person's identity. In the proposed method, feature sets are selected and weighted according to the proportion of occlusion during identification time. Our experimental results on wide variety of real as well as synthetically occluded ears demonstrate that the proposed adaptive feature selection and fusion method significantly improves the recognition performance of occluded ears.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.921
Threshold uncertainty score0.274

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.129
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBiometric Identification and SecurityFrench-language works237,207