PPIs Are Therapeutically Interchangeable and Ideal for a Managed Care Intervention Such as Therapeutic MAC
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PPIs Are Therapeutically Interchangeable and Ideal for a Managed Care Intervention Such as Therapeutic MAC Mabasa and Ma recently published a pharmacy claims database review on the effect of a therapeutic MAC intervention for proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). A therapeutic MAC program establishes a therapeutic maximum allowable cost for a drug category and, unless medical necessity exists, requires patients to pay the drug cost difference when a nonpreferred agent is dispensed. In their Canadian employer group, rabeprazole 10 mg daily was the preferred agent,2 costing Can 71� daily. They found a 22.1% reduction in drug cost per patient per year (PPPY) in the intervention therapeutic MAC group (from Can $357 to Can $278 PPPY) versus a 4.1% increase in the comparison group (from Can $293 to Can $305 PPPY). In response to this study, Peter Wahlqvist, an employee of AstraZeneca, the manufacturer of esomeprazole, has written a letter to the editors of JMCP to highlight a number of fundamental flaws.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.052 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.024 | 0.019 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".