MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2287254566

Abstract: An investigation of spatial and temporal variations of chloride concentrations in selected watersheds of southwestern Nova Scotia

2009· article· en· W2287254566 on OpenAlexaffabout
Timothy Bachiu, Thomas A. Clair, A. M. O’Beirne-Ryan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChlorideSTREAMSSeawaterEnvironmental scienceSulfateEnvironmental chemistryDeposition (geology)PrecipitationNova scotiaChlorineChemistryHydrology (agriculture)GeologyOceanographyMeteorologyGeographySediment
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Environment Canada has monitored the aquatic chemistry of the Kejimkujik region of southwestern Nova Scotia for thirty years and researchers have long recognized a chloride imbalance of outputs and inputs. A comparison of chloride output in streams to the chloride inputs of wet (precipitation) and dry (aerosols) deposition has revealed consistent and significant excess chloride in streams up to an order of magnitude greater than that measured in wet and dry deposition. The focus of this study is to identify and quantify the source(s) of the excess chloride. Presented here are preliminary synthesis results of the Environment Canada data set. These results display spatial and temporal variation of chloride concentrations offering insight into potential sources of excess chloride. Chloride concentrations are variable between watersheds, suggesting a geological or anthropogenic source of excess chloride. Seasonal variations of excess chloride suggest a possible unmeasured atmospheric source. Comparison of Na:Cl ratios in deposition and streams show the chloride in the stream is influenced by solid-phase sodium chloride, rather than the ionic phase in seawater. Chloride in streams is used as a proxy for marine sulphate contributions to the acidification of fresh waters. Identification of the source(s) of excess chloride in streams has implications for the calculation of the sulphate budget in fresh water.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.075
Threshold uncertainty score0.150

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics→French-language works237,207→