MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2287311835 · doi:10.11575/prism/26194

Fluid flow and Smad2 affects the response of vascular endothelial cells in vitro and in vivo

2016· dissertation· en· W2287311835 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Linda Selene Tamez-Vielma

Bibliographic record

VenuePRISM (University of Calgary) · 2016
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAngiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsIn vivoIn vitroFlow (mathematics)Cell biologyChemistryBiologyMechanicsPhysicsBiochemistryBiotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human aortic endothelial cells (HAECs) have been observed to respond to fluid flow and shear stress by activating different signalling molecules both in vitro and in vivo. An important example of these flow-activated molecules is Smad2. Smad2 is a signalling molecule and transcription factor that has shown to be indispensable for the maintenance of vascular integrity. The aim of this study was to understand the effect of shear stress and Smad2 knockdown on endothelial gene expression. HAEC were transfected with Smad2 siRNA, and exposed to steady laminar shear stress (10 dyne/cm2). Our results showed that Smad2 siRNA and shear stress significantly up-regulated genes involved in atherosclerosis, heart dysfunction, and angiogenesis. Furthermore, Smad2 siRNA had a negative impact on athero-protective genes under static conditions. This is the first reported Smad2 siRNA gene expression profile of endothelial cells. Our findings suggest that Smad2 may a have a protective role against cardiovascular diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePRISM (University of Calgary)Same topicAngiogenesis and VEGF in CancerFrench-language works237,207