MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2287799303 · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.178

Unilateral Teleoperated Master-Slave System for Medical Applications

2015· article· en· W2287799303 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Al Mashagbeh, Mir Behrad Khamesee

Bibliographic record

VenueIFAC-PapersOnLine · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoft Robotics and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTeleoperationMaster/slaveRobustness (evolution)Computer scienceRobotVariety (cybernetics)Latency (audio)Real-time computingControl engineeringEngineeringArtificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Surgical robots have been used recently in many medical applications, across a variety of hospitals and health centers. Much research has been done to improve the robustness and accuracy of these robots. This paper describes a unilateral master-slave system implemented to address medical application needs. The communication aspect is the most important characteristic in any master-slave system. Therefore, an improved system is proposed in this paper with reduced time delay between the master and slave systems. The source of latency between the master and slave systems was studied and formulated. Furthermore, real-time filtering and control algorithms were developed to successfully automate this system for practical applications. The results show the possibility of using the proposed system in medical applications such as chest surgery

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIFAC-PapersOnLineSame topicSoft Robotics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207