MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2287814543

Abstract: Chemical and Sm-Nd isotopic constraints on the provenance and tectonic setting of late Neoproterozoic and Cambrian sedimentary and metasedimentary rocks in Avalonia of southern New Brunswick

2008· article· en· W2287814543 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Aaron M. Satkoski, Sandra M. Barr, Scott D. Samson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeochemistry and Elemental Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyFelsicIgneous rockProvenanceMaficGeochemistrySedimentary rockPetrologyMetamorphic rock
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neoproterozoic though Cambrian clastic sedimentary and/or metasedimentary rocks occur in the Hammondvale Metamorphic Suite (> ca. 620 to <680 Ma) and Broad River (ca. 620 Ma), Coldbrook (ca. 560–542 Ma) and Saint John (ca. 540–490 Ma) groups in the Avalonian Caledonia terrane of southern New Brunswick. The petrographic, major and trace element chemical, and Nd isotopic compositions of the sedimentary rocks provide constraints on the provenance and tectonic setting of these units and hence on the tectonic evolution of this typical part of Avalonia. Nd isotopic and whole-rock chemical data show that the Hammondvale Metamorphic Suite and metasedimentary rocks of the Broad River Group have negative eNd values, were derived from recycled sedimentary and mafic igneous sources, and were deposited in intra-arc basins as part of the ca. 620 volcanic-arc complex. In contrast, sedimentary rocks of the Coldbrook Group show generally positive eNd values and likely were derived from Avalonian felsic to intermediate igneous sources and deposited in rift basins associated with 560–550 Ma arc extension. Samples from the overlying Saint John Group have felsic to mafic igneous sources, but are characterized by negative eNd values and likely were deposited as part of a newly forming passive margin sequence. Many metasedimentary and sedimentary samples from the Hammondvale Metamorphic Suite, Broad River Group, and Saint John Group fall outside the normal Nd isotopic range for Avalonian igneous rocks, whereas Coldbrook Group samples fall mainly in the typical Avalonian igneous Nd isotopic range, suggesting a substantially larger Avalonian crustal component in their evolution. Based on their mostly positive eNd values, the sedimentary units in the Coldbrook Group were most likely derived from associated volcanic units as well as the older Broad River Group igneous units. The more negative eNd values for samples from the Hammondvale Metamorphic Suite and Broad River Group indicate a large, isotopically mature source from more interior locations in Gondwana. Based on overlapping detrital muscovite ages and similar Nd isotopic values, the lower Saint John Group units were derived from the Hammondvale Metamorphic Suite, whereas the middle to upper units, which have more evolved Nd isotopic values, appear to require a source outside of the Caledonia terrane.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.619
Threshold uncertainty score0.758

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeochemistry and Elemental AnalysisFrench-language works237,207