MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Extracellular Ba<sup>2+</sup>blocks the cardiac transient outward K<sup>+</sup>current

2000· article· en· W2288185068 on OpenAlexaff
Hong Shi, Huizhen Wang, Zhiguo Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMontreal Heart Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPatch clamp4-AminopyridineExtracellularChemistryCardiac transient outward potassium currentRepolarizationVoltage clampBiophysicsElectrophysiologyPotassium channelInternal medicineMembrane potentialMedicineBiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ba(2+) is widely used as a tool in patch-clamp studies because of its ability to block a variety of K(+) channels and to pass Ca(2+) channels. Its potential ability to block the cardiac transient outward K(+) current (I(to)) has not been clearly documented. We performed whole cell patch-clamp studies in canine ventricular and atrial myocytes. Extracellular application of Ba(2+) produced potent inhibition of I(to) with an IC(50) of approximately 40 microM. The effects were voltage independent, and the inactivation kinetics were not altered by Ba(2+). The potency of Ba(2+) was approximately 10 times higher than that of 4-aminopyridine (a selective I(to) blocker with an IC(50) of 430 microM) under identical conditions. By comparison, Ba(2+) blockade of the inward rectifier K(+) current was voltage dependent; the IC(50) was approximately 20 times lower (2.5 microM) than that for I(to) when determined at -100 mV and was comparable to I(to) as determined at -60 mV (IC(50) = 26 microM). Ba(2+) concentrations of </=1 mM or higher failed to block ultrarapid delayed rectifier K(+) current. Our data suggest that Ba(2+) can be considered a potent blocker of I(to).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory PhysiologySame topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasFrench-language works237,207