MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2288239488 · doi:10.12735/jfe.v3i2p01

Investigating Robust Estimation and Forecasting of Volatilities of Futures with Interquartile Range Models

2015· article· en· W2288239488 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lianqian Yin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Finance & Economics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicMarket Dynamics and Volatility
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFutures contractEconometricsRange (aeronautics)EstimationInterquartile rangeEconomicsStatisticsFinancial economicsMathematicsEngineeringAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A robust proxy of volatility, interquartile range is investigated with the estimation and forecasting of volatility of five American futures using GARCH-type models. With utilizing realized volatility as the yardstick of true underlying volatility, the Mincer-Zarnowitz (MZ) regression and four loss functions in Hansen and Lunde (2005) are employed as criterions for assessing the forecasting ability of competitive volatility models, both in sample and out of sample. It is found that, in samples of NY Light Crude (CL) and NY Natural Gas (NG) which are more volatile and have more extreme outliers than the other three, interquartile range models outperforms those standard models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.596
Threshold uncertainty score0.500

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.137 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Finance & EconomicsSame topicMarket Dynamics and VolatilityFrench-language works237,207