MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2288294146

The Anti-Tax-Haven Initiative and the Foreign Affiliate Rules

2008· article· en· W2288294146 on OpenAlexaff
Melanie Huynh, Eric Lockwood, Michael Miakawa

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCorporate Taxation and Avoidance
Canadian institutionsPricewaterhouseCoopers (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTax havenHouse of CommonsDenialCriticismIncome taxHavenFinanceSafe havenPolitical scienceForeign direct investmentInvestment (military)EconomicsLaw and economicsEconomic policyBusinessPublic administrationPublic economicsTax reformInternational economicsIndirect taxLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the federal budget presented to the House of Commons on March 19, 2007, Finance Minister Jim Flaherty proposed to effectively eliminate the ability to deduct interest on borrowings relating to investments in foreign affiliates. In response to widespread criticism, on May 14, 2007, Minister Flaherty announced a substantially revised and more narrowly focused interest denial rule. The revised proposal, referred to as the anti-tax-haven initiative (ATHI), has as its primary objective the prevention of double-dipping - the generation of two (or more) interest expense deductions in respect of one investment. The authors of this article examine the mechanics of the ATHI, including its practical limitations, and explore issues concerning the future integration of the ATHI with the foreign affiliate regime and other provisions of the Income Tax Act.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.009
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0060.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSSRN Electronic JournalSame topicCorporate Taxation and AvoidanceFrench-language works237,207