Allocation tolerance by Jacobian-torsor model
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper describes a novel method for implementing tolerance synthesis by decoupled inversion of the Jacobian-torsor tolerance analysis model. Earlier work showed that a coupled pseudo inversion of the non-square Jacobian matrix implements an equal repartition of the functional requirement interval over all part tolerances involved in the chain, which is not representative of the way tolerances are usually assigned. Purchased parts become particularly problematic: bearings, fasteners, etc, that are bought externally come with their own manufactured tolerances which might not comply with such an equal repartition strategy. To correct this, we need a way to maintain independent tolerance values for each part that make up the functional chain. Doing so would give designers all the freedom necessary to determine tolerance values for each part depending where it comes from or from which process it was manufactured. The paper presents a decoupled Jacobian inversion strategy that implements such a more realistic way of performing tolerance synthesis. Example of using the model to design a totally functional mechanism is also provided.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it