MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2288371371

Le projet pilote de perspectives canadiennes de la SCC

2007· article· fr· W2288371371 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Neil R Poulter

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed Central · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicHealth and Medical Research Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En 2006, la Societe canadienne de cardiologie (SCC), dans le cadre de son processus de planification strategique, a etabli que les cardiologues communautaires etaient prioritaires pour son avenir. Pour maximiser sa valeur aupres des cardiologues communautaires, la SCC a apporte d’importantes ameliorations aux programmes scientifiques offerts dans le cadre du congres canadien sur la sante cardiovasculaire. De plus, plusieurs nouveaux projets ont ete mis sur pied pour mieux repondre aux besoins de formation des cardiologues communautaires au Canada. L’un de ces projets s’intitule « Perspectives canadiennes du programme ESC/AHA.07 ».

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.068
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.648
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.068
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed CentralSame topicHealth and Medical Research ImpactsFrench-language works237,207