MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2288450576 · doi:10.1007/978-3-0348-8438-9_9

A Revised Implementation of the Reverse Search Vertex Enumeration Algorithm

2000· book-chapter· en· W2288450576 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBirkhäuser Basel eBooks · 2000
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Geometry and Mesh Generation
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolyhedronEnumerationConvex hullVertex (graph theory)CombinatoricsMathematicsRegular polygonLexicographical orderDegeneracy (biology)Integer points in convex polyhedraExtreme pointAlgorithmBounded functionConvex polytopeConvex setComputer scienceInteger programmingConvex optimizationGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes an improved implementation of the reverse search vertex enumeration/convex hull algorithm for d-dimensional convex polyhedra. The implementation uses a lexicographic ratio test to resolve degeneracy, works on bounded or unbounded polyhedra and uses exact arithmetic with all integer pivoting. It can also be used to compute the volume of the convex hull of a set of points. For a polyhedron with m inequalities indvariables and known extreme point, it finds all bases in time O(md) 2 per basis. This implementation can handle problems of quite large size, especially for simple polyhedra (where each basis corresponds to a vertex and the complexity reduces to O (md) per vertex). Computational experience is included in the paper, including a comparison with an earlier implementation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.814
Threshold uncertainty score0.966

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it