MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2288524172 · doi:10.3968/8196

The Construction of Female Subject Identity in The Grapes of Wrath

2016· article· en· W2288524172 on OpenAlex
Limin Wu

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in literature and language · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmerican Literature and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubject (documents)Identity (music)DualismEssentialismConstruct (python library)Consistency (knowledge bases)Order (exchange)PerfectionSociologyGender studiesAestheticsPsychologyEpistemologyArtPhilosophyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The description of those females in The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck is very impressive, among whom Ma Joad is depicted in such a way as one of the most important figures for the whole story. Though sharing some similarities with the traditional women in the past English novels, Ma Joad is very different. The close connection with as well as differences from the traditional gender role pattern are combined in this woman. It is just through the newly-opened window of differentiation that the reader can reconsider females and construct a new female identity. Mainly from an ecofeminist angle, the paper is going to study the consistency to and differences from the traditional gender roles of women exhibited in the novel, expound on the changing subject identity of women throughout the novel, in order to prove that female subject identity in the novel is beyond essentialism and dualism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.332
Threshold uncertainty score0.309

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it