MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2288584783 · doi:10.1137/15m1034283

Low-Rank Spectral Optimization via Gauge Duality

2016· article· en· W2288584783 on OpenAlexafffund
Michael P. Friedlander, Ives Macêdo

Bibliographic record

VenueSIAM Journal on Scientific Computing · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced X-ray Imaging Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersOffice of Naval ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsDuality (order theory)Mathematical optimizationRank (graph theory)Eigenvalues and eigenvectorsLow-rank approximationOptimization problemHermitian matrixApplied mathematicsComputationOperator (biology)DeconvolutionPreconditionerRange (aeronautics)Matrix completionAlgorithmIterative methodMathematical analysisDiscrete mathematicsPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Various applications in signal processing and machine learning give rise to highly structured spectral optimization problems characterized by low-rank solutions. Two important examples that motivate this work are optimization problems from phase retrieval and from blind deconvolution, which are designed to yield rank-1 solutions. An algorithm is described that is based on solving a certain constrained eigenvalue optimization problem that corresponds to the gauge dual which, unlike the more typical Lagrange dual, has an especially simple constraint. The dominant cost at each iteration is the computation of rightmost eigenpairs of a Hermitian operator. A range of numerical examples illustrate the scalability of the approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSIAM Journal on Scientific ComputingSame topicAdvanced X-ray Imaging TechniquesFrench-language works237,207