Overexpressing Fragments of CREB-Binding Protein (CBP) to Block Transcriptional Dysregulation and Toxicity in Huntington's Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Huntington’s disease (HD) is caused by expression of the huntingtin gene containing an expanded CAG repeat. N-terminal mutant huntingtin protein (N-mHtt) accumulates in the nucleus and impairs transcription of a subset of genes through incorporation into transcriptional complexes or sequestration of proteins away from the promoter. CREB-binding protein (CBP) is a transcriptional co-activator and acetyltransferase (AT) that binds to N-mHtt. We hypothesized that overexpressing CBP fragments that lack a promoter association domain would block N-mHtt-mediated transcriptional dysregulation and toxicity. We found that overexpressing full-length CBP or CBP fragments did not reverse transcriptional dysregulation, but did decrease toxicity in a cell model of HD. Overexpressing fragments of CBP containing the AT domain increased toxicity in wild-type cells, while overexpressing a fragment lacking this domain had no effect. We conclude that excess AT activity was detrimental in wild-type cells, while overexpressing CBP or CBP fragments was protective in HD cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".