An architecture of diffusion: an electroacoustic music facility for the city of Calgary
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A common debate regarding contemporary music is the perceived loss of the performer, the performance, and therefore, the need for the performance environment. Current trends in contemporary musical performance blur the traditional definition of live through the use of electronic technologies. The majority of music is now rarely composed in reference to a particular performance space; rather it is composed to produce optimal sounds out of a home stereo. It is important that we understand these changes, and redefine the nature of performance and performance space within an electronic culture. The genre of electroacoustic music can provide an exceptional opportunity to explore new means in which the links between music, performance, and architecture can be renewed. The Masters Degree Project (MOP) will investigate the ways in which we can begin to redefine contemporary performance, along with how performance and architecture can engage and interact with one another to provide for a contemporary performance environment. The design of an electroacoustic music facility for the city of Calgary will test theories regarding an architecture of performance, allowing electroacoustic music to develop with contemporary performance practices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".